the full armor of God or ballistic body armor (bullet proof vest)?
Why isn’t the full armor of God enough? Is god not all powerful? Will he not protect his followers? Why don’t you trust your god with your life?

Caffeinated Content for WordPress

8 Responses to “If you were a soldier going to Iraq, which would you wear: the full armor of God, or ballistic body armor?”

1. Mujahid on October 6th, 2008 12:46 am

   quit the army.

2. Katie™ on October 6th, 2008 5:46 pm

   Both.
   Idiot.

3. De tre bukkene Bruse on October 9th, 2008 11:25 am

   The way the British goverment funds our armed forces you wouldnt get a choice

4. samy n on October 12th, 2008 2:14 pm

   i would refuse to go mainly,to kill peoples without any cause

5. Eric on October 15th, 2008 9:42 am

   Ballistic body armor. Wouldn’t matter if I died anyway, it’s worth a shot!

6. Rawrmagaddon! on October 15th, 2008 9:45 am

   I’d rather wear studded leather armour +2, which gives me +20 to my sneak skill.

7. Thumbs Me Down cuz TRUTH HURTS on October 17th, 2008 8:55 am

   The full armor of God didnt help Nate Saint and those 4 missionaries one bit. 2 of them were in World War 2 (which involved bombs and grenades and rifles) and survived, yet none of them survived a confrontation with a couple indians with spears. Therefore, body armor is always more important to preserve your life than the full armor of god

8. mandm68 on October 20th, 2008 4:36 pm

   The full armor of god going before themgood luck steve.